
Antonio Williams
Overview
Board Oct 12Week 5 rest-of-season review, Oct 12, 2026. The three reads are where our backtested model, the betting market and his 2026 production each place him at WR; our board rank is the call.
Where his stats say he could finish from here: WR67 to WR87. Our rank stays the call.
2026 so far5 games
- target share up from 11.8% to 18.6% (last 2 games vs the three before)
- snap share up from 42% to 69% (last 2 games vs the three before)
- 53% of snaps (83rd of 103 WRs)
Ranked among 103 qualified WRs this season.
80% range 2.3–7.0 half-PPR points a game. Biggest inputs: experience +0.2, college target/carry share -0.2, college carry share +0.2, preseason ADP -0.2. The model informs the rank; it does not set it.
Week 6
Lines Oct 14Updated Oct 14, 2026, built on a WAS team total of 21.5. Rank is among every WR we project this week.
Allowed to WRs per game across 5 games. Best games against them: Michael Wilson (W3, 25.9 PPR, 11/17 89 yds); Jaxon Smith-Njigba (W5, 22.8 PPR, 5/8 102 yds); Ryan Miller (W2, 14.7 PPR, 1/1 77 yds).
EPA ranks entering Week 6: #13 against the pass, #8 against the run (1 = best defense).
Big number: receiving fantasy points SF allows a game to WRs in that zone. # = its rank of 32. Green tag = Antonio Williams's share of his targets in that zone this season. Depth is air yards at the catch point; 5 games, through Week 5. Tap a zone for the detail.
3-31 rec on 3 tgt
Game log
2026 · through W5Every gametap a game for the detail
WAS +6 (closing) · total 43.5 · 82°F, wind 7 mph · 7 days rest · division game
Projected 5.7 (WR74) · WAS +3.5 (closing) · total 51.5 · indoors · 7 days rest · division game
Projected 3.7 (WR89) · WAS +8.5 (closing) · total 40.5 · 63°F, wind 13 mph · 7 days rest
Projected 5.3 (WR75) · WAS +4.5 (closing) · total 46.5 · 70°F, wind 7 mph · 7 days rest
Projected 5.7 (WR66) · WAS -3.5 (closing) · total 41.5 · 7 days rest · division game
D# = the opponent's rank against WRs entering that week (1 = stingiest, 32 = softest). Finish = his rank at WR that week.
Usage
What changedlast 3 full games vs. before
| W1, W2 | W3, W4, W5 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap share | 43.0% | 59.3% | +16.3 |
| Target share | 11.3% | 16.2% | +4.9 |
| Air-yard share | 11.0% | 18.0% | +7.0 |
| Targets a game | 3.5 | 5.0 | +1.5 |
Games he left injured are left out of both sides.
WAS target treeshare of team targets, 2026
Season to date, games each player played.
Role details2026, through Week 5
Advanced
Percentile against the WRs on our charts (each stat's minimum is next to it), 2026 through Week 5. 50 is the middle of the pack. Tap a bubble for his rank.
Expected vs. actualPPR, from this season's play-by-play
1 TDs on 1.15 expected. Expected points price every target by depth and field position and every carry by field position. Do touchdowns regress? ›
Splits
As a receiver2026 charted plays, through Week 5
| Situation | Tgt | Rec-Yds-TD | Yds/tgt | EPA/tgt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All targets | 22 | 15-155-1 | 7.08.2 | 0.230.27 |
| Red zone9% of targets | 2 | 2-17-1 | 8.54.4 | 1.860.18 |
| Inside the 105% of targets | 1 | 1-1-1 | 1.02.4 | 1.48-0.01 |
| Third down36% of targets | 8 | 4-47-1 | 5.97.1 | -0.060.14 |
| Score within 755% of targets | 12 | 6-51-0 | 4.38.1 | -0.480.26 |
| Trailing by 8+45% of targets | 10 | 9-104-1 | 10.48.2 | 1.080.28 |
| Two-minute drill23% of targets | 5 | 3-13-1 | 2.67.5 | -0.040.17 |
| Vs. the blitz23% of targets | 5 | 4-40-1 | 8.07.9 | 0.850.23 |
| No blitz77% of targets | 17 | 11-115-0 | 6.88.4 | 0.040.29 |
| Play action27% of targets | 6 | 4-50-0 | 8.310.4 | 0.430.41 |
| With motion50% of targets | 11 | 8-77-0 | 7.08.3 | 0.340.32 |
| Screens9% of targets | 2 | 1-6-0 | 3.04.7 | -0.56-0.20 |
Small grey number = every WR in that situation. Green or red = a clear gap either way. 17 of his 22 charted targets were catchable; 1 drop, 0 of 2 contested caught.
With and withoutfantasy points a game, WAS, 2025–2026
"Without" = games he played and the teammate did not (a QB counts as playing with 10+ attempts). Games either of them left injured are left out. Small samples swing hard. Who benefits when a player gets hurt? ›
Team
WASWashington Commanders offense, 2026 through Week 5. Rank 1 = most. Scheme rates from FTN charting through Week 5.
Game by gamescore, implied total, pass rate (over expected), QB
| Week | Score | Implied | Pass rate | QB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1vs PHI | 22-24 | 18.8 | 53%−10.4 | Daniels34 att |
| W2vs DAL | 20-37 | 24.0 | 52%−15.4 | Daniels17 att |
| W3vs SEA | 33-31 | 16.0 | 52%−2.4 | Mariota31 att |
| W4vs IND | 13-30 | 21.0 | 64%−6.1 | Kaliakmanis33 att |
| W5vs NYG | 27-27 | 22.5 | 52%−14.8 | Daniels25 att |
Depth chartWR, Oct 14
Scheduleeach defense's current rank vs WRs
Green = soft, red = stingy (1 = stingiest, 32 = softest), ranked on fantasy points allowed to WRs so far. Gold underline = fantasy playoffs. Does strength of schedule matter? ›
Head coach: Dan Quinn. QB: Jayden Daniels (most pass attempts, Week 5).
Charts
Antonio Williams is highlighted on each chart. Swipe for more; tap a dot for the player. Every chart saves and shares as an image on the Charts page.
Career
Season by season
| Year | G | Rec-Yds-TD | Pts/g | xFP/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026WAS | 5 | 15-155-122 tgt, 14.2% share | 5.8WR71 | 7.8−2.3 |
Under points a game: his rank at WR in points a game (8+ games; 2026: 2+ games). xFP = expected PPR a game from his usage; under it, the season's points over expected. Routes = share of team dropbacks he ran a route (through 2025).
Health
No injury designation. Not on the Sleeper injury list as of Oct 10 and not on the Week 6 practice report so far.
2026 injury reportofficial, week by week
✓ = not listed. Letters = game status (Q, D, O) or worst practice that week (LP limited, DNP did not practice). Tap a week for the detail.
Teammates on the report
Our current notes first, then Sleeper designations. What happens when a starter is ruled out? ›
Value
Market Oct 10Market value on a 0–10,000 scale, through Oct 10, 2026. Faint stretches are estimates between real readings. Gold = peak.
Teal dot = today (4,186). Box = the middle half of outcomes, white line = the median, whiskers = 10th to 90th percentile. WRs about 22 valued near #104 overall: real 1-year moves since 2022, weighted by exact age and market rank (about 112 players' worth).
Profile
Athletic profilepercentile vs WRs at the combine since 2010
College production
| Year | G | Rec-Yds-TD | Yds share | Dominator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025Clemson | 9 | 55-604-4 | 22.7% | 21.9 |
| 2024Clemson | 13 | 70-836-10 | 23.5% | 26.5 |
| 2023Clemson | 4 | 17-192-2 | 17.0% | 17.6 |
| 2022Clemson | 13 | 52-557-4 | 19.0% | 17.9 |
Share = his share of his team's receiving yards. Dominator = average of his share of receiving yards and TDs.