Every game, every stat category, and what the board says. 12.22 points per game in 2025, an ADP of 85.7, usage worth 9.6.
26 years old · 4 seasons of experience · 2022 draft class
| SLEEPER | 93.7 |
| ESPN | 97.9 |
| YAHOO | 84 |
| UNDERDOG | 87.8 |
| CBS | 67.1 |
| FFA | 102 |
| Goes around | Round 8, pick 2 in a 12-team draft |
| Positional rank | WR34 |
| Bye week | 13 |
| ADP standard deviation | 13.7 picks |
Our board has him at 153.6 points, 9.4 per game — 49.4 catches, 796 yards, 4.1 TDs. That is WR5, 102 overall.
The range runs from a floor of 7 points per game to a ceiling of 14.1, with the median at 9.4. Boom rate 50%, bust rate 26%. The spread is the actual bet, not the middle number.
He goes at 85.7 on consensus and our board has him 102. We rank him 16.3 picks worse than the room drafts him. At that distance it is a fade: we do not want him anywhere near his ADP.
a genuinely extreme, unsustainable efficiency level on very low volume the past two seasons (20+ yards/catch each year) that will almost certainly come down in raw rate even as the team pays him like they expect a much larger role. Recovering from foot surgery adds real uncertainty about both his health and how much practice-rep chemistry he'll have built with the QB by Week 1.
watch · medium conviction · 2026-08Indianapolis Colts returns 5 of 6 continuity slots, replacing wr1. Daniel Jones at quarterback, Shane Steichen as head coach, Jim Bob Cooter calling it. The offense projects to 32.5 pass attempts a game at high confidence and 26.1 rushes.
In: Nick Westbrook-Ikhine (wr3), Deion Burks (wr5), Seth McGowan (rb3), Anderson Castle (rb4). Out: Michael Pittman Jr (wr1), Adonai Mitchell (wr4), Ameer Abdullah (rb3).
His own projected target share for 2026 is 17%, with a bear case of 16.5% and a bull case of 19% and a full range of 15.6% to 19.8%. That comes from 25 historical comparables, not from a depth chart.
The projected target split across the offense:
| Josh Downs | 20.1% |
| Tyler Warren | 19.1% |
| Alec Pierce ← | 17% |
| Jonathan Taylor | 10.1% |
| Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 10% |
| Deion Burks | 4.8% |
What the offense looks like: The Colts seriously need Daniel Jones to BE THAT GUY. Taylor, Downs, and especially Alec Pierce rely on having a highly productive passing game that helps lift the entire offense as whole. Tyler Warren has shown flashes of being the next George Kittle, really awesome player.
Key additions: Colts brought in WR Nick Westbrook-Ikhine in free agency. Westbrook-Ikhine was a highly dynamic WR while in Tennessee. Could be nohting, but could help.
Key departures: WR Michael Pittman Jr traded to Steelers. QB Anthony Richardson requested a trade & will not play again for the Colts.
Notes: Anthony Richardson will be traded or released. Daniel Jones on track for full recovery from torn achilles & landed extension. Very positive for offense. Jonathan Taylor aging but HIGHLY productive. Alec Pierce lands MASSVIVE 4 year contract & Colts invested in him as their WR1. Josh Downs is primed for an increase workload & could truly break out in 2026. Michael Pittman Jr. traded to Steelers. Tyler Warren is a top TE in dynasty & could have a MASSIVE season next year.
How the volume number was reached: Same QB Daniel Jones returning — anchor to 2025 actuals (32.1 att/g); Regressed 30% toward league mean 33.5, floored at 30 → 32.5 att/g.
25 historical comps for WRs age ~25, prior share 15.8%, same team, OC continuity. Distribution: median 20.1%, p25-p75 [17.9%, 23.8%], tails [15.7%, 25.7%]. Closest comps: George Pickens 2022→2023 (PIT: 16.0%→24.2%); Michael Gallup 2021→2022 (DAL: 19.7%→16.8%); Marquez Valdes-Scantling 2020→2021 (GB: 15.6%→14.9%). Adjustment: -5% from td_luck_breakout (TD regression risk)
self-anchored 58% to own 15.8% role (3yr), 42% to comp median 20.1%
The named comps are the closest historical matches and the arrow is what their share actually did the following season. That is the working, not a summary of it — if you disagree with the projection, this is the part to argue with.
Offensive environment: IND rates 23.3 against a league average of 23, 0.3 points above it on opponent-adjusted least squares (multi-capture merge).
Opponent-adjusted pass defense faced, against 2025 ratings. Positive is an easier slate.
| Full season | +1.1 · neutral |
| Weeks 1–6 | +4.7 · easier |
| Weeks 12–17 | -0.8 · neutral |
| Fantasy playoffs (15–17) | +2.9 · easier |
Read this narrowly. Our own testing found that season-long strength of schedule does not survive as a draft input — defensive quality is among the least stable team properties year to year, and a preseason slate is built on last year's identities. The playoff-weeks column is the only one we would let break a tie, and even then it is a tiebreaker rather than a reason. The finding.
From the absence record rather than a depth chart — who actually gained when he was out.
| Season | Games missed | Main beneficiary | Their PPR gain |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2 | Ashton Dulin | +4.2 |
Everything in this section is about his dynasty trade value — what he is worth as a long-term asset in the trade market. It is not a forecast of his 2026 fantasy scoring. A player can be a fine redraft pick while his dynasty value falls, and the reverse. The redraft read is above; this is a different question with a different answer.
His dynasty value has moved +86.6% over the last twelve months. The market cycle classifies him as post-spike. The base rate that applies: after a +30% spike, WRs crash the following year 40% of the time (hold 60%). That puts the measured risk of his dynasty value falling sharply over the next year at 40% — a probability drawn from comparable historical seasons, not a prediction, and not a statement about his 2026 scoring.
For context on how long this lasts at the position: the average career at his position produces 2.1 elite seasons and 2.6 startable seasons.
Matched on production profile — production-driven (pedigree ignored). The last column is how that player’s dynasty value moved the following year — a market outcome, not a scoring one.
| Player | Season | Their PPG | Similarity | Next year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elijah Moore | 2024 | 7.1 | 73% | -32.2% |
| Tee Higgins | 2023 | 11.5 | 69% | +22.9% |
| Rashod Bateman | 2024 | 10.9 | 69% | -17.8% |
| Jerry Jeudy | 2023 | 8.9 | 67% | +55.8% |
| Christian Kirk | 2023 | 12.5 | 66% | -15.9% |
Of the 5 with a following season on record, 2 gained value, 3 lost it and 0 held roughly flat.
| Drafted | 2022, round 2, pick 53 by IND |
| College | Cincinnati |
| Age at draft | 22 |
| Height | 6′3″ |
| Weight | 211 lb |
| 40-yard dash | 4.41s |
| Vertical | 40.5″ |
| Broad jump | 129″ |
| 3-cone | 7.13s |
| Shuttle | 4.28s |
| Career PPR per game | 8.6 |
| Week-to-week variation | 0.9 |
| Boom rate | 25% |
| Bust rate | 30.8% |
| Games missed per season | 1 |
| Injury history | Concussion |
| Correlation between his posted line and his actual score | 0.19 |
That correlation is how closely the books’ posted line tracked what he actually scored, week to week. A higher number means the market has him figured out and there is less to exploit; a lower one means his weeks are harder to price.
Injury type matters more than games missed. Measured across our injury database, knee and foot returns stay below a player’s pre-injury baseline for all three of the first games back, while hamstring returns over-recover by the third.
His best game was Week 18 against HOU — 29.2 PPR on 7 targets and a 21.2% target share, in a game that finished 30-38. His worst was Week 17 against JAX at 0, on 5 targets, final score 17-23. Across 15 games he cleared 20 points 2 times and came in under 8 points 5 times. In the 9 games decided by 8 points or fewer he averaged 11.9; in the 6 decided by more, 12.8. He scored more when the game was not close.
His usage that season was worth 9.6 points per game. He scored 12.22, 27.8% above it. The engine classified the season as very_lucky. On receiving touchdowns specifically he finished 4 against 2.13 expected, a gap of 1.9.
| Wk | Opp | Score | PPR | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt% | Snap% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIA | 33-8 | 4.6 | 1 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 10.3% | 79% |
| 2 | DEN | 29-28 | 10.8 | 4 | 5 | 68 | 0 | 15.2% | 90% |
| 3 | TEN | 41-20 | 10.7 | 4 | 5 | 67 | 0 | 20% | 54% |
| 6 | ARI | 31-27 | 6.8 | 2 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 13.3% | 81% |
| 7 | LAC | 38-24 | 14.8 | 5 | 10 | 98 | 0 | 31.3% | 87% |
| 8 | TEN | 38-14 | 8.9 | 2 | 5 | 69 | 0 | 17.9% | 81% |
| 9 | PIT | 20-27 | 17.5 | 6 | 13 | 115 | 0 | 27.1% | 91% |
| 10 | ATL | 31-25 | 18.4 | 4 | 7 | 84 | 1 | 26.9% | 95% |
| 12 | KC | 20-23 | 3.6 | 1 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 6.5% | 96% |
| 13 | HOU | 16-20 | 17.8 | 4 | 5 | 78 | 1 | 20% | 96% |
| 14 | JAX | 19-36 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 80 | 0 | 22.2% | 83% |
| 15 | SEA | 16-18 | 2.6 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 3.8% | 100% |
| 16 | SF | 27-48 | 24.6 | 4 | 4 | 86 | 2 | 11.1% | 97% |
| 17 | JAX | 17-23 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17.2% | 91% |
| 18 | HOU | 30-38 | 29.2 | 4 | 7 | 132 | 2 | 21.2% | 68% |
| Receptions | 47 |
| Targets | 84 |
| Receiving yards | 1,003 |
| Touchdowns | 6 |
| Points per game | 12.22 |
| Yards per target | 11.94 |
| Catch rate | 55.95% |
| Snap share | 85.93% |
| Target share | 17.6% |
| Air-yards share | 40.61% |
| WOPR | 0.547 |
| RACR | 0.713 |
| Average depth of target | 18.9 |
| Yards after catch per reception | 3.7 |
| Yards before catch per reception | 17.6 |
| Total YAC | 174 |
| Broken tackles | 1 |
| Drop rate | 0% |
| Passer rating when targeted | 112.4 |
| Receiving EPA per game | 3.72 |
| Red-zone targets | 9 |
| Red-zone target share | 11.7% |
| End-zone target share | 34.6% |
| Expected receiving TDs | 2.13 |
| Actual receiving TDs | 4 |
| Receiving TD luck | 1.87 |
Against everyone in the 80+ targets pool that season:
| Points per game | 22 of 44 |
| Yards per target | 1 of 44 |
| Target share | 41 of 44 |
| Air-yards share | 5 of 44 |
The offense threw it 546 times. He took 15.91% of the targets. 3 team-mates cleared the competing-target threshold.
| Tyler Warren | 21.21% |
| Michael Pittman | 21.02% |
| Josh Downs | 16.67% |
| Alec Pierce ← | 15.91% |
| Jonathan Taylor | 10.42% |
| Mo Alie-Cox | 3.79% |
He caught passes from 3 quarterbacks that season, and the splits are not close.
| QB | Games | Targets | PPG | Y/T | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jones | 10 | 59 | 11.39 | 11.68 | 18.85% |
| Philip Rivers | 3 | 10 | 9.07 | 10.2 | 10.7% |
| Riley Leonard | 2 | 15 | 21.1 | 14.13 | 21.7% |
5 of his 15 games were blowouts, 33.7% of his snaps coming in them. He averaged 12.36 in those and 11.86 in close games — a meaningful share of his scoring came with the game already decided.
His best game was Week 17 against NYG — 24.2 PPR on 9 targets and a 24.3% target share, in a game that finished 33-45. His worst was Week 15 against DEN at 0, on 4 targets, final score 13-31. Across 16 games he cleared 20 points 3 times and came in under 8 points 8 times. In the 12 games decided by 8 points or fewer he averaged 9.5; in the 4 decided by more, 11.8. He scored more when the game was not close.
His usage that season was worth 7.6 points per game. He scored 10.09, 32% above it. The engine classified the season as very_lucky. On receiving touchdowns specifically he finished 4 against 1.88 expected, a gap of 2.1.
| Wk | Opp | Score | PPR | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt% | Snap% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HOU | 27-29 | 21.5 | 3 | 3 | 125 | 1 | 15.8% | 84% |
| 2 | GB | 10-16 | 16.6 | 5 | 7 | 56 | 1 | 22.6% | 95% |
| 3 | CHI | 21-16 | 5.4 | 1 | 2 | 44 | 0 | 11.1% | 77% |
| 4 | PIT | 27-24 | 1.9 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 7.1% | 83% |
| 5 | JAX | 34-37 | 22.4 | 3 | 3 | 134 | 1 | 6.7% | 74% |
| 6 | TEN | 20-17 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11.1% | 89% |
| 7 | MIA | 16-10 | 3.5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 22.7% | 79% |
| 8 | HOU | 20-23 | 2.1 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 12.9% | 78% |
| 9 | MIN | 13-21 | 7.1 | 3 | 3 | 41 | 0 | 11.1% | 89% |
| 10 | BUF | 20-30 | 18.1 | 4 | 7 | 81 | 1 | 20% | 86% |
| 11 | NYJ | 28-27 | 10.4 | 3 | 4 | 74 | 0 | 14.3% | 80% |
| 12 | DET | 6-24 | 4.9 | 1 | 4 | 39 | 0 | 16% | 73% |
| 13 | NE | 25-24 | 9.6 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 25% | 71% |
| 15 | DEN | 13-31 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 11.1% | 46% |
| 17 | NYG | 33-45 | 24.2 | 6 | 9 | 122 | 1 | 24.3% | 95% |
| 18 | JAX | 26-23 | 13.7 | 2 | 2 | 57 | 1 | 5.1% | 82% |
| Receptions | 37 |
| Targets | 69 |
| Receiving yards | 824 |
| Touchdowns | 7 |
| Points per game | 10.09 |
| Yards per target | 11.94 |
| Catch rate | 53.62% |
| Snap share | 80.06% |
| Target share | 14.81% |
| Air-yards share | 28.14% |
| WOPR | 0.419 |
| RACR | 0.578 |
| Average depth of target | 21.5 |
| Yards after catch per reception | 3.2 |
| Yards before catch per reception | 19.1 |
| Total YAC | 118 |
| Broken tackles | 0 |
| Drop rate | 0% |
| Passer rating when targeted | 106.2 |
| Receiving EPA per game | 2.52 |
| Red-zone targets | 6 |
| Red-zone target share | 9.4% |
| End-zone target share | 23.1% |
| Expected receiving TDs | 1.88 |
| Actual receiving TDs | 4 |
| Receiving TD luck | 2.12 |
The offense threw it 513 times. He took 14.05% of the targets. 2 team-mates cleared the competing-target threshold.
| Michael Pittman | 22.61% |
| Josh Downs | 21.79% |
| Alec Pierce ← | 14.05% |
| Adonai Mitchell | 11.2% |
| Jonathan Taylor | 6.31% |
| Kylen Granson | 6.31% |
He caught passes from 2 quarterbacks that season, and the splits are not close.
| QB | Games | Targets | PPG | Y/T | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Richardson | 9 | 39 | 8.22 | 9.74 | 16.83% |
| Joe Flacco | 7 | 30 | 12.49 | 14.8 | 12.2% |
2 of his 16 games were blowouts, 3% of his snaps coming in them. He averaged 2.45 in those and 9.52 in close games — his scoring did not depend on garbage time.
His best game was Week 13 against TEN — 19 PPR on 6 targets and a 14.6% target share, in a game that finished 31-28. His worst was Week 18 against HOU at 0, on 4 targets, final score 19-23. Across 17 games he cleared 20 points 0 times and came in under 8 points 14 times. In the 9 games decided by 8 points or fewer he averaged 7.1; in the 8 decided by more, 3.9. He scored more when the game was live.
His usage that season was worth 6.6 points per game. He scored 5.61, 14.6% below it. The engine classified the season as unlucky. On receiving touchdowns specifically he finished 0 against 1.48 expected, a gap of -1.5.
| Wk | Opp | Score | PPR | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt% | Snap% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAX | 21-31 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 7.7% | 92% |
| 2 | HOU | 31-20 | 4.8 | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 6.5% | 100% |
| 3 | BAL | 22-19 | 7.3 | 3 | 7 | 43 | 0 | 16.7% | 96% |
| 4 | LA | 23-29 | 4.8 | 1 | 2 | 38 | 0 | 8.3% | 91% |
| 5 | TEN | 23-16 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 8.3% | 98% |
| 6 | JAX | 20-37 | 5.5 | 3 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 11.5% | 74% |
| 7 | CLE | 38-39 | 8.3 | 3 | 3 | 53 | 0 | 13.6% | 100% |
| 8 | NO | 27-38 | 7.1 | 3 | 5 | 41 | 0 | 13.2% | 94% |
| 9 | CAR | 27-13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8.3% | 100% |
| 10 | NE | 10-6 | 3.1 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 3.8% | 96% |
| 12 | TB | 27-20 | 6.7 | 4 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 15% | 95% |
| 13 | TEN | 31-28 | 19 | 3 | 6 | 100 | 1 | 14.6% | 99% |
| 14 | CIN | 14-34 | 4.2 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 7.9% | 91% |
| 15 | PIT | 30-13 | 2.3 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 18.5% | 97% |
| 16 | ATL | 10-29 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 30 | 0 | 20% | 100% |
| 17 | LV | 23-20 | 12.8 | 1 | 1 | 58 | 1 | 5% | 98% |
| 18 | HOU | 19-23 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17.4% | 97% |
| Receptions | 32 |
| Targets | 65 |
| Receiving yards | 514 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Points per game | 5.61 |
| Yards per target | 7.91 |
| Catch rate | 49.23% |
| Snap share | 95.18% |
| Target share | 11.55% |
| Air-yards share | 21.89% |
| WOPR | 0.329 |
| RACR | 0.62 |
| Average depth of target | 14.9 |
| Yards after catch per reception | 3 |
| Yards before catch per reception | 13 |
| Total YAC | 97 |
| Broken tackles | 1 |
| Drop rate | 0% |
| Passer rating when targeted | 79.9 |
| Receiving EPA per game | 1.01 |
| Red-zone targets | 6 |
| Red-zone target share | 9.2% |
| End-zone target share | 29.4% |
| Expected receiving TDs | 1.48 |
| Actual receiving TDs | 0 |
| Receiving TD luck | -1.48 |
The offense threw it 574 times. He took 11.9% of the targets. 2 team-mates cleared the competing-target threshold.
| Michael Pittman | 28.57% |
| Josh Downs | 17.95% |
| Alec Pierce ← | 11.9% |
| Kylen Granson | 9.16% |
| Zack Moss | 6.78% |
| Will Mallory | 4.76% |
He caught passes from 2 quarterbacks that season, and the splits are not close.
| QB | Games | Targets | PPG | Y/T | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gardner Minshew | 15 | 60 | 5.94 | 7.85 | 12.02% |
| Anthony Richardson | 2 | 5 | 3.15 | 8.6 | 8% |
4 of his 17 games were blowouts, 18.9% of his snaps coming in them. He averaged 4.5 in those and 7.11 in close games — his scoring did not depend on garbage time.
His best game was Week 13 against DAL — 18.6 PPR on 8 targets and a 22.9% target share, in a game that finished 19-54. His worst was Week 15 against MIN at 0, on 5 targets, final score 36-39. Across 16 games he cleared 20 points 0 times and came in under 8 points 10 times. In the 11 games decided by 8 points or fewer he averaged 6.7; in the 5 decided by more, 7.7. He scored more when the game was not close.
His usage that season was worth 8.3 points per game. He scored 7.02, 15.8% below it. The engine classified the season as unlucky.
| Wk | Opp | Score | PPR | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD | Tgt% | Snap% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HOU | 20-20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4.1% | 51% |
| 3 | KC | 20-17 | 9.1 | 3 | 5 | 61 | 0 | 13.9% | 45% |
| 4 | TEN | 17-24 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 80 | 0 | 16.7% | 44% |
| 5 | DEN | 12-9 | 16.1 | 8 | 9 | 81 | 0 | 25% | 59% |
| 6 | JAX | 34-27 | 13.9 | 3 | 7 | 49 | 1 | 12.5% | 65% |
| 7 | TEN | 10-19 | 6.7 | 3 | 4 | 37 | 0 | 9.8% | 97% |
| 8 | WAS | 16-17 | 9.5 | 3 | 5 | 65 | 0 | 21.7% | 57% |
| 9 | NE | 3-26 | 3.3 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 0 | 7.1% | 71% |
| 10 | LV | 25-20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7.4% | 65% |
| 11 | PHI | 16-17 | 5.8 | 3 | 8 | 28 | 0 | 25.8% | 71% |
| 12 | PIT | 17-24 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6.3% | 70% |
| 13 | DAL | 19-54 | 18.6 | 4 | 8 | 86 | 1 | 22.9% | 71% |
| 15 | MIN | 36-39 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 16.1% | 77% |
| 16 | LAC | 3-20 | 5.6 | 3 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 14.3% | 73% |
| 17 | NYG | 10-38 | 4.5 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 18.5% | 83% |
| 18 | HOU | 31-32 | 7.2 | 3 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 11.8% | 64% |
| Receptions | 41 |
| Targets | 78 |
| Receiving yards | 593 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Points per game | 7.02 |
| Yards per target | 7.6 |
| Catch rate | 52.56% |
| Snap share | 66.44% |
| Target share | 14.62% |
| Air-yards share | 26.24% |
| WOPR | 0.403 |
| RACR | 0.767 |
| Average depth of target | 11.7 |
| Yards after catch per reception | 2.8 |
| Yards before catch per reception | 11.7 |
| Total YAC | 113 |
| Broken tackles | 0 |
| Drop rate | 0% |
| Passer rating when targeted | 75.4 |
| Receiving EPA per game | 1.21 |
| Red-zone targets | 6 |
| Red-zone target share | 9.5% |
| End-zone target share | 14.3% |
| Expected receiving TDs | 1.43 |
| Actual receiving TDs | 1 |
| Receiving TD luck | -0.43 |
The offense threw it 604 times. He took 13.47% of the targets. 2 team-mates cleared the competing-target threshold.
| Michael Pittman | 24.35% |
| Parris Campbell | 15.72% |
| Alec Pierce ← | 13.47% |
| Jonathan Taylor | 6.91% |
| Kylen Granson | 6.91% |
| Jelani Woods | 6.91% |
He caught passes from 3 quarterbacks that season, and the splits are not close.
| QB | Games | Targets | PPG | Y/T | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Ryan | 11 | 58 | 7.47 | 7.28 | 14.59% |
| Sam Ehlinger | 4 | 16 | 6.13 | 9.06 | 14.77% |
| Nick Foles | 1 | 4 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 14.3% |
4 of his 16 games were blowouts, 28.5% of his snaps coming in them. He averaged 8 in those and 6.69 in close games — a meaningful share of his scoring came with the game already decided.
Ask the Coach about Alec Pierce →