Sam Roush
Overview
2026 so far4 games
Week 6
Lines Oct 14CHI
ATLUpdated Oct 14, 2026, built on a CHI team total of 26.25. Rank is among every TE we project this week.
Allowed to TEs per game across 5 games. Best games against them: Darren Waller (W2, 18.3 PPR, 3/3 33 yds); Pat Freiermuth (W1, 15.6 PPR, 5/5 46 yds); Juwan Johnson (W4, 11.9 PPR, 6/8 59 yds).
EPA ranks entering Week 6: #17 against the pass, #10 against the run (1 = best defense).
Big number: receiving fantasy points ATL allows a game to TEs in that zone. # = its rank of 32. Green tag = Sam Roush's share of his targets in that zone this season. Depth is air yards at the catch point; 5 games, through Week 5. Tap a zone for the detail.
did not record a stat
Game log
2026 · through W5Every gametap a game for the detail
Projected 0.4 (TE88) · CHI -4.5 (closing) · total 46.5 · 68°F, wind 8 mph · 7 days rest · division game
Projected 0.8 (TE81) · CHI +3.5 (closing) · total 42.5 · 64°F, wind 3 mph · 8 days rest · prime time
Projected 1.8 (TE57) · CHI -3.5 (closing) · total 43.5 · 72°F, wind 3 mph · 6 days rest
Projected 1.8 (TE51) · CHI -1.5 (closing) · total 46.5 · 7 days rest · division game
D# = the opponent's rank against TEs entering that week (1 = stingiest, 32 = softest). Finish = his rank at TE that week.
Usage
What changedlast 3 full games vs. before
| W2 | W3, W4, W5 | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap share | 27.0% | 18.0% | −9.0 |
| Target share | 10.0% | 2.0% | −8.0 |
| Air-yard share | 8.5% | -62.9% | −71.4 |
| Targets a game | 3.0 | 0.7 | −2.3 |
Games he left injured are left out of both sides.
CHI target treeshare of team targets, 2026
Season to date, games each player played.
Splits
As a receiver2026 charted plays, through Week 5
| Situation | Tgt | Rec-Yds-TD | Yds/tgt | EPA/tgt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All targets | 5 | 3-33-0 | 6.67.1 | 0.610.25 |
| Red zone20% of targets | 1 | 0-0-0 | 0.04.6 | -0.450.61 |
| Score within 7100% of targets | 5 | 3-33-0 | 6.67.0 | 0.610.22 |
| Vs. the blitz80% of targets | 4 | 2-25-0 | 6.36.8 | 0.620.20 |
| No blitz20% of targets | 1 | 1-8-0 | 8.07.2 | 0.580.27 |
| Play action80% of targets | 4 | 2-17-0 | 4.37.3 | 0.100.25 |
| With motion80% of targets | 4 | 3-33-0 | 8.37.4 | 0.890.29 |
| Screens20% of targets | 1 | 1-8-0 | 8.05.8 | 0.580.03 |
Small grey number = every TE in that situation. Green or red = a clear gap either way. 5 of his 5 charted targets were catchable; 2 drops, 0 of 0 contested caught.
Team
CHIChicago Bears offense, 2026 through Week 5. Rank 1 = most. Scheme rates from FTN charting through Week 5.
Game by gamescore, implied total, pass rate (over expected), QB
| Week | Score | Implied | Pass rate | QB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1vs CAR | 59-37 | 25.3 | 44%−11.5 | Williams29 att |
| W2vs MIN | 3-9 | 25.5 | 55%−14.5 | Williams26 att |
| W3vs PHI | 27-7 | 19.5 | 51%+4.2 | Keenum34 att |
| W4vs NYJ | 23-12 | 23.5 | 41%−9.2 | Bagent34 att |
| W5vs GB | 7-31 | 24.0 | 65%−2.4 | Bagent21 att |
Depth chartTE, Oct 14
Scheduleeach defense's current rank vs TEs
Green = soft, red = stingy (1 = stingiest, 32 = softest), ranked on fantasy points allowed to TEs so far. Gold underline = fantasy playoffs. Does strength of schedule matter? ›
Head coach: Ben Johnson. QB: Tyson Bagent (most pass attempts, Week 5).
Career
Season by season
| Year | G | Rec-Yds-TD | Pts/g | xFP/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026CHI | 4 | 3-33-05 tgt, 4.0% share | 1.2TE71 | — |
Under points a game: his rank at TE in points a game (8+ games; 2026: 2+ games). xFP = expected PPR a game from his usage; under it, the season's points over expected. Routes = share of team dropbacks he ran a route (through 2025).
Health
No injury designation. Not on the Sleeper injury list as of Oct 10 and not on the Week 6 practice report so far.
2026 injury reportofficial, week by week
✓ = not listed. Letters = game status (Q, D, O) or worst practice that week (LP limited, DNP did not practice). Tap a week for the detail.
Teammates on the report
Our current notes first, then Sleeper designations. What happens when a starter is ruled out? ›
Value
Market Oct 10Market value on a 0–10,000 scale, through Oct 10, 2026. Faint stretches are estimates between real readings. Gold = peak.
Teal dot = today (1,678). Box = the middle half of outcomes, white line = the median, whiskers = 10th to 90th percentile. TEs about 23 valued near #329 overall: real 1-year moves since 2022, weighted by exact age and market rank (about 42 players' worth).
170.0 overall, TE43. ESPN 170.0 · Underdog 216.0
Profile
Athletic profilepercentile vs TEs at the combine since 2010
College production
| Year | G | Rec-Yds-TD | Yds share | Dominator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025Stanford | 11 | 49-545-2 | 22.9% | 19.8 |
| 2024Stanford | 11 | 40-334-2 | 15.4% | 14.0 |
| 2023Stanford | 9 | 28-288-0 | 13.1% | 6.6 |
| 2022Stanford | 5 | 2-34-0 | 2.7% | 1.4 |
Share = his share of his team's receiving yards. Dominator = average of his share of receiving yards and TDs.